![]() ![]() Texmaker did not accept any attempts to customize the bibtex command in a way to accept either environment variables or cd commands or any other stuff I tried. Doing that, you need to run the bibtex step from within the build directory. Part of the solution is to look at placed we can touch: It’s possible to use \bibliography. Neither did bibtex have a command line option to indicate different file locations to look for. After skimming over a bunch of pages of the package documentation I found no solution, which enabled me to have this reference manipulated. However, the master-blx.bib sits nicely in the build directory as it should, but bibtex looks for both files in the same directory. The bibliography data, which bibtex will look for are the original bibliography and the auxiliary bibliography generated by BibLaTeX. Remember I mentioned biblatex references to the auxiliary bibliography file ( master-blx.bib) from the x? Those lines look something like that: ![]() After some troubleshooting I figured out where the problem lies. Using the default quick build (set to use pdflatex + bibtex + pdflatex + pdflatex + view) did not work. Additionally there’s the trusty bibliography file, in this case called bib.bib. Usually the actual content of my work will be scattered across separate tex files. Furthermore I hate clutter in my working directory, so a separate build directory is key.Īssume the following example files: The master.tex, where all my packages are loaded and usually a lot of other stuff is happening. There were however two things I really wanted to hold on to: I love Texmaker so obviously I want the quick build button to work as usual. Biber or BibTex) and it creates an auxiliary bibliography, which is referenced then in the aux file of your master document. The way it is supposed to work is quite straight forward: You include the BibLaTex package, tell it which bibliography backend to use (i.e. ![]() My primary motivation to give it a try was, that citing web-resources seemed much easier. Just the other day I was trying to use BibLaTeX over BibTeX, because I heard good things about it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |